Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Emma Woods Responds to Paracast and Gene Steinberg's Defamations
Excellent and highly, as always, articulate response by Emma Woods to the recent lies by many on the Paracast forum, including of course the one responsible for what goes on there, Gene Steinberg. UFO Magazine - UFO Magazine Blog - Response to Paracast Defamation
Not to hijack Emma's case here, but it is time to stop. It's time for others to stop accusing people they simply dislike of being child molesters, or liars, or making threats where none were made, or of being mentally ill. Just fucking stop it.
And I've never said it publicly, but it's long overdue: thank you Paul Kimball for stepping up and refusing to participate in such a place where these kinds of things are said on a daily basis.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
What has to stop are the lies about what we say and do. No, I never accused "Emma Woods" of being a child molester, and she was not defamed. Telling the truth is not defamation.
I'm sorry you don't believe in civil discourse, not of the right of people to disagree agreeably.
Gene Steinberg
Push a sock in it Steinberg; once again you've missed the broad side of idea-barn by the obligatory parsec! Would that your mother had been the one to hold an aspirin between _her_ knees, eh? Or, maybe you just look for situations you can hijack to prosecute your turgid and tedious if moribund and pedestrian initiative as lacking in imagination as it is lacking in the remotest relevancy.
Ms. Lee made an allusion to people who spread, engineer, or facilitate slander and the kinds of slander facilitated ... and you--you dog-faced popinjay--are every _bit_ of that... every bit! You are a slanderer in support of slanderers, Steinberg, and so beneath all concern, consideration, and contempt.
You have slandered me and you have slandered Emma Woods: a woman who is your moral, ethical, and philosophical superior. Now shut up and step off before I'm compelled to provide citations for all of this and otherwise go medieval on your facile literary ass. Posted! Say hi to "darlin' Don"!
Oh -- and please iterate your "truths" about Emma woods, you slimy miscreant! It's _not_ the truth just because you use the word!
Well!? C'mon! Serve it up!
Steinberg! Get back over here and clean up this duplicitous literary turd you left behind! Stat!
A coward in 2012 and such remains so at the end of 2015...
@Lehmberg: Incoherence as usual.
Suggest your readers consult http://emmawoodstherealstory.com/index.html for a fuller presentation of what really happened between Jacobs and "Emma Woods." Pay particular attention to the emails and transcripts that she withheld since they disprove her key claims.
Now back to the childish insults.
Gene Steinberg
I'll gladly embrace _all_ incoherence, Steinberg, you fulminating twat, if it means I can avoid pandering, like yourself, to snakes and weasels abusing trust, violating best practice, and preying on the suffering of persons expecting professional behavior from lettered "professionals" duplicitously using University stationary in order to fake an unctuous collegiality! You _know_ that Meers is a shill for science-less and sophistic silliness betraying the very study it purports to encourage. You shill for shills, Steinberg, refuse to comprehend your complicity with leering psychopaths dead and alive, pronounce glibly upon that of which you have no proper understanding and, finally are the very portrait of the irrelevant drongo, playing with a weak hand, obviously bluffing and breathing on losing your saggy ass and leased car. Piss off. Posted. Coherent enough for you?
Is there a treatment for this? I hope so.
Really? Maybe if you asked me for money? ...Things a little slow at the paracrap and you figure that if you stir your pestilent David Jacobs shit with a stick maybe you can scare up a little attention for yourself, Steiny? Time for another embarrassing plea for cash so you celebrate the dodgy activities of monsters and psychopaths while you discount and slander persons wounded by same? You really _are_ a fulminating twat. Add to that "irrelevant swine" and "whining drongo"! I suspect there is _no_ treatment for these... _our_ hard luck, eh?
Post a Comment